KerfMathSupport Us

Western Larch — Density, Movement, Workability & Cost

Western larch is a deciduous conifer nearly as dense as soft maple, and its strong growth-ring contrast is loud enough that it sells as feature flooring.

Larix occidentalis · also sold as tamarack (western), mountain larch, hackmatack

Density
36 lb/ft³
577 kg/m³ at 12% MC
Janka hardness
830 lbf
3692 N
Radial shrinkage
4.5%
coefficient 0.15
Tangential shrinkage
9.1%
coefficient 0.3033
T/R ratio
2.0
moves unevenly
Volumetric
14%
green to oven-dry
Typical cost
$5.00/bf
budget tier
Origin
Domestic
Inland Pacific Northwest
Type
Softwood

Western larch (Larix occidentalis) drops its needles every autumn like a hardwood sheds its leaves, which confuses people the first time they see a "pine tree" standing bare in winter — it's a deciduous conifer, one of a small handful worldwide, and its wood is denser than most of the true pines it grows alongside.

Harder than it looks on the shelf

At 36 lb/ft³ and 830 lbf on the Janka scale, western larch is one of the densest softwoods grown on the continent — harder than most pines and not far off red maple's 950 lbf, a genuinely hardwood-adjacent number for a conifer. It splits readily along the grain and carries enough natural resin to gum a blade if the feed rate drops, closer in that respect to a pine than to a spruce or fir.

Movement, and why the figure reads loud even before finish

Tangential shrinkage of 9.1% against a radial figure of 4.5% gives a 2.0 ratio — right at this site's movement-prone threshold, and the strong growth-ring contrast that defines larch visually also means a flatsawn board's grain reads busy and dramatic even before any stain touches it. A 10"-wide board seasoning from a wet 15% down to a drier 9% loses about 0.182" (4.6mm) across its width; the wood movement calculator covers narrower and wider boards alike. A 3/4"-thick, 5"-wide, 7-foot flooring board weighs about 6.6 lb; the wood weight calculator covers other flooring sizes.

Working around the resin, and a finish choice that matters

Resin pockets can genuinely interfere with a glue joint, so wiping a suspect area with solvent before assembly is worth the extra step. Under stain, the already-strong ring contrast gets exaggerated further, sometimes past the point of looking natural — a clear finish generally suits this species better, letting the wood's own contrast do the work rather than amplifying it artificially.

Durability, cost, and a wood sold two ways

The heartwood is moderately durable, and it's used untreated for fence posts in its home range without much complaint. At roughly $5 per board foot it's inexpensive, priced close to red alder. Flooring, framing, poles and posts, plywood, and boat planking round out its uses — the flooring market treats it as a feature wood specifically because of that dramatic grain contrast, while the framing market treats the exact same species as commodity structural lumber.

Set against the pines it's often mistaken for

Larch is frequently confused with Douglas fir and the harder pines at a casual glance, but its deciduous habit and unusually strong ring figure set it apart once you know to look — a shop buying "larch" flooring specifically for the visual drama should confirm the species rather than accepting a substitute, since the effect genuinely depends on this particular grain pattern.

What people actually ask about western larch

Does western larch's needle-dropping habit affect when in the year it's typically harvested, the way it might for a true evergreen? Not meaningfully — commercial harvest scheduling is driven by logistics, access, and mill demand rather than the tree's foliage cycle, since the wood itself is cut from the trunk regardless of whether the crown is bare or needled at the time.

Does staining larch flooring to a uniform tone actually work, or does the ring contrast always show through? Pigment stain can visibly mute the contrast somewhat, but it rarely erases it entirely, since the density difference between earlywood and latewood affects how deeply stain penetrates each band, not just how it looks under a clear coat — a buyer wanting a genuinely uniform floor is usually better served by a different species.

How does western larch's moderate durability compare specifically to Douglas-fir for an untreated fence post? It holds up somewhat better than Douglas-fir's own moderate rating in ground contact, though neither approaches what a naturally very durable species offers, so both are realistic choices only where a shorter, replaceable service life is an acceptable tradeoff against upfront cost.

Is larch a good choice for a workbench top, given its hardness? Its density and hardness are genuine assets there, closer to a domestic hardwood than most softwoods offer, though the strong grain contrast will read visually busier than a plainer bench-top species like beech or maple.

Western larch carries unusually thick, fire-resistant bark for a conifer, a trait foresters credit with helping mature stands survive the low-intensity ground fires common across its inland range. (Density and hardness testing is The Wood Database's, at 12% moisture content; shrinkage is read from FPL's Table 4-3.)

Working with Western Larch

At the bench

Deciduous conifer, and one of the densest softwoods on the continent — harder than most pines and comparable to soft maple in Janka. It splits readily and is resinous enough to gum blades. The strong growth-ring contrast makes it visually loud, which is why it is sold as a feature flooring as often as it is used as a stud.

Glue-up

Resin pockets can interfere; wipe with solvent where they surface.

Finishing

The ring contrast exaggerates under stain. Clear finishes suit it better.

Durability

Moderately durable heartwood; used untreated for posts in its home range.

Commonly used forflooring · framing · poles and posts · plywood · boat planking

Where these figures come fromShrinkage figures on this page come from the USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory's Wood Handbook (General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, 2010) - Table 4-3 for North American species and Table 4-4 for imported ones. It is a US federal government publication, it is in the public domain, and it is the reference most other woodworking sites are quietly copying. For the handful of woods those tables do not cover, we use The Wood Database, which reproduces the same FPL figures species by species; every entry says which source its numbers came from. The movement coefficients are not a separate measurement. They are derived from the shrinkage figures the standard way - divide the total green-to-oven-dry shrinkage by 30, the nominal fibre saturation point - so that you can multiply width by the change in moisture content and get an answer in inches. Two honest limits are worth knowing. Shrinkage is not perfectly linear with moisture content, and the fibre saturation point is not exactly 30% for every species; it runs from about 26% to about 34%. And every figure here is a species average drawn from tested samples, while the board on your bench is one tree from one site. Use these numbers to size an expansion gap or choose between two woods, not to predict a specific board to the thousandth.

This species: shrinkage — USDA FPL Wood Handbook (FPL-GTR-190, 2010), Chapter 4, Table 4-3; density — The Wood Database (average dried weight at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook; hardness — The Wood Database (Janka side hardness at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook.

Prices are 2026 US retail estimates for 4/4 rough stock in hobbyist quantities and vary considerably by region, supplier and grade.