Red Maple — Density, Movement, Workability & Cost
Red maple does most of what hard maple does at two-thirds the hardness and two-thirds the price, cutting more easily at the direct cost of dent resistance.
Acer rubrum · also sold as soft maple, swamp maple, scarlet maple
- Density
- 38 lb/ft³
- 609 kg/m³ at 12% MC
- Janka hardness
- 950 lbf
- 4226 N
- Radial shrinkage
- 4%
- coefficient 0.1333
- Tangential shrinkage
- 8.2%
- coefficient 0.2733
- T/R ratio
- 2.0
- moves unevenly
- Volumetric
- 12.6%
- green to oven-dry
- Typical cost
- $5.50/bf
- budget tier
- Origin
- Domestic
- Eastern North America
- Type
- Hardwood
"Soft maple" is a misleading name for red maple (Acer rubrum) — at 950 lbf on the Janka scale it's exactly as hard as black cherry and harder than butternut, chestnut, or half the softwoods on this site's list. It's only "soft" relative to its own harder cousin, hard maple (1,450 lbf), and the lumber trade kept the name anyway because the distinction that actually matters — which maple species you're holding — is otherwise hard to state quickly at a yard counter.
The trade-off that defines it
Red maple runs 38 lb/ft³ against hard maple's 44 lb/ft³, and does everything hard maple does at roughly two-thirds the hardness and, at about $5.50 per board foot against hard maple's $8, close to two-thirds the price too. It cuts more easily, burns less readily under a router bit, and is a genuinely better carving and moulding wood — the price for all of that is real dent resistance, which is exactly why nobody builds a butcher block or a bowling pin out of it. Mineral streaks — grey-green or dark mineral deposits running with the grain — are common in red maple and read as either a defect or the reason a particular board got bought, depending entirely on the project.
Movement sits right at the line
A tangential:radial ratio of exactly 2.0 puts red maple right on this site's movement-prone threshold — not as bad as hard maple's 2.1 but not meaningfully better either, since 2.0 and 2.1 are close enough in practice that both deserve the same wide-panel caution. A 14"-wide flatsawn panel (a typical cabinet door width) moving from an 11% moisture content down to a dry 6% MC contracts about 0.191" (4.9mm) across its width, computed from red maple's own tangential shrinkage of 8.2%. That's meaningfully more movement than hard maple would show at the same width and MC swing, despite red maple's lower overall density — hardness and dimensional stability are not the same property, and red maple is proof. Try your own panel width on the wood movement calculator. A 3/4"-thick, 14"-wide, 80"-tall door panel like the one above weighs about 18.5 lb — check other sizes on the wood weight calculator.
Working and finishing it
It bonds well with glue and, unlike hard maple, doesn't glaze under a dull planer knife, so surface prep before glue-up is genuinely less fussy. It still blotches under pigment stain — less viciously than hard maple, but enough that most professional shops treat it as a painted-work wood by default rather than fighting the blotching with a conditioner every time. That's not a compromise so much as red maple's actual job: it is the standard secondary and painted-cabinetry wood across North America, chosen specifically because paint hides both the mineral streaks and the blotch tendency that would be a problem under a clear finish.
Where it goes, and when to reach for the harder sibling instead
Furniture frames, mouldings, painted cabinetry, turnings and pallets are the five uses that show up most, and all five lean on cost and workability rather than hardness. If a project genuinely needs dent resistance — a countertop, a workbench top, a floor — hard-maple is the better-suited relative even at a real cost premium; if it doesn't, red maple does the job for less money and less fighting at the tool. Compared against black-cherry, which shares its 950 lbf hardness almost exactly, the real choice is colour and finish behaviour rather than strength: cherry darkens under UV and red maple stays pale, which is exactly why cherry gets left clear and red maple gets painted.
Common questions about red maple
Is red maple the same thing as "soft maple" on an invoice? In North American lumber yards, yes — "soft maple" is a commercial grouping that includes red maple and silver maple, distinguished from "hard maple" (sugar maple), and red maple is the species most commonly sold under that label.
Does spalting ruin the wood, or is it desirable? Both, depending on the buyer. Red maple spalts (develops dark zone lines and sometimes soft pockets from early-stage fungal decay) faster than most hardwoods, and turners actively seek out spalted red maple blanks for the figure, while a furniture builder generally wants to catch and discard a board before spalting compromises its strength.
Why does my red maple project look blotchy even after conditioning? Conditioner helps but doesn't eliminate the effect on this species — red maple's tight, closed grain resists even pigment absorption regardless of pretreatment, which is why professional shops more often dye it or paint it than fight it with stain and conditioner together.
Shrinkage figures are from the USDA Forest Products Laboratory's Wood Handbook (FPL-GTR-190, 2010), Table 4-3; density and Janka hardness come from The Wood Database's 12%-moisture-content measurements, citing the same federal source this site uses throughout its domestic species list.
Working with Red Maple
At the bench
Everything hard maple does, at two-thirds the hardness and two-thirds the price. It cuts more easily, burns less readily and is a far better carving and moulding wood, at the cost of dent resistance. Mineral streaks are common and can be either a defect or the reason you bought the board.
Glue-up
Bonds well, and unlike hard maple it does not glaze under a dull knife.
Finishing
Still blotches, though less viciously than hard maple. It is the standard secondary wood for painted work.
Durability
No decay resistance to speak of; it also spalts fast, which some turners exploit.
Commonly used forfurniture frames · mouldings · painted cabinetry · turnings · pallets
Where these figures come fromShrinkage figures on this page come from the USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory's Wood Handbook (General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, 2010) - Table 4-3 for North American species and Table 4-4 for imported ones. It is a US federal government publication, it is in the public domain, and it is the reference most other woodworking sites are quietly copying. For the handful of woods those tables do not cover, we use The Wood Database, which reproduces the same FPL figures species by species; every entry says which source its numbers came from. The movement coefficients are not a separate measurement. They are derived from the shrinkage figures the standard way - divide the total green-to-oven-dry shrinkage by 30, the nominal fibre saturation point - so that you can multiply width by the change in moisture content and get an answer in inches. Two honest limits are worth knowing. Shrinkage is not perfectly linear with moisture content, and the fibre saturation point is not exactly 30% for every species; it runs from about 26% to about 34%. And every figure here is a species average drawn from tested samples, while the board on your bench is one tree from one site. Use these numbers to size an expansion gap or choose between two woods, not to predict a specific board to the thousandth.
This species: shrinkage — USDA FPL Wood Handbook (FPL-GTR-190, 2010), Chapter 4, Table 4-3; density — The Wood Database (average dried weight at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook; hardness — The Wood Database (Janka side hardness at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook. The dominant species sold as "soft maple" in North American yards.
Prices are 2026 US retail estimates for 4/4 rough stock in hobbyist quantities and vary considerably by region, supplier and grade.