KerfMathSupport Us

Utile — Density, Movement, Workability & Cost

Utile is sapele's larger, calmer sibling, carrying a broader and less regular stripe with enough less interlock that a sharp plane can sometimes get through it.

Entandrophragma utile · also sold as sipo, assie, African mahogany (trade)

Density
40 lb/ft³
641 kg/m³ at 12% MC
Janka hardness
1180 lbf
5249 N
Radial shrinkage
4.9%
coefficient 0.1633
Tangential shrinkage
6.9%
coefficient 0.23
T/R ratio
1.4
relatively stable
Volumetric
11.8%
green to oven-dry
Typical cost
$13.00/bf
premium tier
Origin
Imported
Tropical West and Central Africa
Type
Hardwood

Sapele gets all the attention on the retail shelf, but boat and door builders who've worked both often reach past it for utile (Entandrophragma utile) — sapele's larger, calmer sibling in the same genus, with a broader, less regular stripe and enough less interlock that a genuinely sharp plane can sometimes get through it clean.

Sapele's quieter relative

At 40 lb/ft³ and 1,180 lbf on the Janka scale, utile sits close to sapele in both weight and hardness. The real working difference is interlock: utile's grain twists less aggressively, which reduces tearout risk at the plane and gives it a genuine edge for anyone doing hand-tool work rather than machining everything with power tools and sandpaper.

Meaningfully more stable than sapele on a wide panel

Radial shrinkage of 4.9% against a tangential figure of 6.9% gives a 1.4 ratio — comfortably stable, and utile's overall shrinkage runs a bit better-behaved than sapele's on a genuinely wide panel, which is exactly the size an exterior door stile actually needs to survive. A 20"-wide door-stile-sized board moving from an 11% moisture content to a dry 6% gives up about 0.23" (5.8mm) across its width; check a narrower stile on the wood movement calculator. A 1"-thick, 7-foot door-panel blank cut to that same 20" width weighs about 38.9 lb at utile's milled density — the wood weight calculator covers other panel sizes.

Working it, and a finishing step worth the extra time

Gluing is reliable with normal preparation. A grain filler markedly improves the finished surface — without one, the open pore structure that both utile and sapele share leaves a slightly uneven sheen under a film finish. With filling, it takes a genuinely fine polish.

Durability, cost, and where boatbuilders specifically choose it

Utile is moderately durable, and notably better than sapele in ground contact, though still short of what a true decking species like ipe offers. At roughly $13 per board foot it's priced close to sapele. Exterior doors and windows, boatbuilding, furniture, veneer, and joinery round out its markets — the boatbuilding preference specifically reflects the combination of better ground-contact durability and calmer grain than its more famous cousin offers.

The choice boat and door builders actually make

Where sapele's dramatic, tight ribbon stripe is the point of a design, sapele wins outright — nothing else in this price range matches that figure. Where the job is exterior doors, window frames, or boat components that need to machine predictably and resist the elements a little better, utile is very often the more practical choice, even though it's less visually striking on a retail shelf.

What people actually ask about utile

Is utile actually a type of mahogany, or is that just a marketing name? It's in the same broader mahogany family (Meliaceae) as sapele and African mahogany, sharing genus-level traits, though it's a genuinely distinct species from true American mahogany (Swietenia) — the family relationship is real, the species identity is separate.

Does a furniture maker have any reason to choose utile over sapele the way a boatbuilder does, or is sapele always the better pick for cabinetry? For a piece where the figure itself is the selling point, sapele wins outright, but for painted or veneer-covered casework, a large stable panel, or a project where the calmer grain simply reads better against other materials in the room, utile's improved stability and easier hand-tool compatibility are genuine reasons to specify it over its more famous relative.

Does utile finish as well as sapele with the same techniques? Yes, largely — both benefit from a grain filler before a film finish, and both respond well to oil finishes that bring out their natural colour, though utile's broader, calmer stripe reads less dramatically than sapele's tight ribbon even under an identical finish.

Since utile and sapele sit at similar prices, is there a reason a supplier would stock one and not the other? Regional demand patterns drive it more than the wood's own properties — a yard near boatbuilding or exterior joinery trade tends to stock more utile, while one serving furniture and instrument makers leans toward sapele's more dramatic figure, so availability often comes down to what the local trade actually specifies rather than either species being harder to import.

Utile's density, Janka hardness and shrinkage figures come from The Wood Database's 12%-moisture-content testing, since this species is not separately listed in the USDA Forest Products Laboratory's Table 4-4. The genus Entandrophragma also includes kosipo and sipo, two further mahogany-family imports that rarely reach the retail market the way this species and sapele both do.

Working with Utile

At the bench

Sapele's larger, calmer sibling — same genus, similar density, but with a broader and much less regular stripe, and enough less interlock that a sharp plane can sometimes get through it. Boat and door builders prefer it over sapele for exactly that reason, plus its slightly better stability.

Glue-up

Reliable.

Finishing

A grain filler improves it markedly; otherwise it finishes evenly.

Durability

Moderately durable, better than sapele in ground contact but still not a decking wood.

Commonly used forexterior doors and windows · boatbuilding · furniture · veneer · joinery

Health and handling

Recorded skin and respiratory irritant.

Conservation status

IUCN Vulnerable; not CITES-listed.

Where these figures come fromShrinkage figures on this page come from the USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory's Wood Handbook (General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, 2010) - Table 4-3 for North American species and Table 4-4 for imported ones. It is a US federal government publication, it is in the public domain, and it is the reference most other woodworking sites are quietly copying. For the handful of woods those tables do not cover, we use The Wood Database, which reproduces the same FPL figures species by species; every entry says which source its numbers came from. The movement coefficients are not a separate measurement. They are derived from the shrinkage figures the standard way - divide the total green-to-oven-dry shrinkage by 30, the nominal fibre saturation point - so that you can multiply width by the change in moisture content and get an answer in inches. Two honest limits are worth knowing. Shrinkage is not perfectly linear with moisture content, and the fibre saturation point is not exactly 30% for every species; it runs from about 26% to about 34%. And every figure here is a species average drawn from tested samples, while the board on your bench is one tree from one site. Use these numbers to size an expansion gap or choose between two woods, not to predict a specific board to the thousandth.

This species: shrinkage — The Wood Database (shrinkage), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook; density — The Wood Database (average dried weight at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook; hardness — The Wood Database (Janka side hardness at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook. Not separately listed in FPL Table 4-4; figures from The Wood Database.

CITES appendix and annotation statements on this site were read directly from the CITES Appendices I, II and III valid from 5 March 2026 - the text that entered into force after the 20th Conference of the Parties (CoP20, Samarkand, 24 November to 5 December 2025) - at https://cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php. The appendix number alone does not tell you what is controlled; the annotation does. Annotation #6 covers logs, sawn wood, veneer sheets and plywood. Annotation #17 adds transformed wood, meaning continuously shaped stock such as mouldings and flooring. Annotation #15, used for Dalbergia and the three listed bubingas, regulates all parts and derivatives but exempts finished musical instruments, their parts and accessories, and finished products containing up to 10 kg of the listed wood per shipment. Annotation #2 exempts seeds, pollen and finished products packaged and ready for retail trade. Annotation #4 is broader still and reaches parts and derivatives generally. Listings change at each Conference of the Parties, roughly every three years, and some take effect on a delayed date after that - so check the appendices yourself before you import, and treat this page as a pointer rather than as customs advice.

Prices are 2026 US retail estimates for 4/4 rough stock in hobbyist quantities and vary considerably by region, supplier and grade.