Port Orford Cedar — Density, Movement, Workability & Cost
Port Orford cedar beats every other North American softwood on strength-to-weight, which is why Japanese temple builders use it as a substitute for hinoki.
Chamaecyparis lawsoniana · also sold as Lawson cypress, Oregon cedar, white cedar
- Density
- 29 lb/ft³
- 465 kg/m³ at 12% MC
- Janka hardness
- 590 lbf
- 2624 N
- Radial shrinkage
- 4.6%
- coefficient 0.1533
- Tangential shrinkage
- 6.9%
- coefficient 0.23
- T/R ratio
- 1.5
- relatively stable
- Volumetric
- 10.1%
- green to oven-dry
- Typical cost
- $14.00/bf
- premium tier
- Origin
- Domestic
- Southwestern Oregon and northern California
- Type
- Softwood
Japanese temple builders, unable to source enough hinoki cypress for a restoration project, have specified Port Orford cedar (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana) as a substitute — a striking endorsement for a species most American woodworkers have never heard of, and a genuine sign of how closely its working properties match wood used in some of the world's most exacting traditional joinery.
The best strength-to-weight ratio of any North American softwood
At 29 lb/ft³ and 590 lbf on the Janka scale, Port Orford cedar isn't unusually dense or hard — its real distinction is strength relative to its weight, the best of any softwood grown on the continent. That property sent it into early aircraft construction and arrow shafts, two applications where every ounce matters and failure isn't an option, and it smells distinctly of ginger when worked, a genuinely pleasant departure from the more generic cedar scent most people expect.
Movement, and a boat-planking weight
Tangential shrinkage of 6.9% against a radial figure of 4.6% gives a 1.5 ratio, comfortably stable. An 8"-wide plank gives up about 0.11" (2.8mm) across its width on the swing from 12% moisture content down to a dry 6%; a narrower or wider plank runs through the wood movement calculator. Milled 1/2" thick and 6" wide for an 8-foot boat-planking run, the same stock weighs about 4.8 lb — the wood weight calculator covers other planking sizes.
Working it cleanly, and a resource under real threat
The wood bonds well and holds a scarf joint reliably, which is exactly why boatbuilders rely on it for long structural runs. Its fine, even texture takes a clear finish beautifully, and in traditional Japanese work it's often left entirely bare, allowed to weather naturally rather than sealed. The real limiting factor today is Phytophthora lateralis, a root disease that has severely restricted harvest across much of the species' range — availability is genuinely constrained in a way that has nothing to do with the wood's own working properties.
Durability, cost, and its niche but devoted markets
Port Orford cedar is durable, with good resistance to insects, consistent with its long history in exterior boat and building applications. It lands around $14 a board foot — this site's premium bracket — a price driven directly by the disease-restricted supply rather than any change in demand. Arrow shafts, boatbuilding, Japanese joinery, musical instrument soundboards, and venetian blinds round out its markets — the soundboard use draws on the same strength-to-weight property that made it valuable for aircraft.
The substitute relationship, both directions
Where genuine hinoki isn't available or affordable, Port Orford cedar is the accepted Western substitute in Japanese-style joinery, sharing enough working character — fine, even texture, good stability, a similar aromatic quality — that experienced joiners can move between the two without much adjustment. Where Port Orford cedar itself becomes unavailable because of disease-restricted supply, western redcedar is the more available, if working-wise quite different, regional alternative.
What people actually ask about Port Orford cedar
Are there disease-resistant Port Orford cedar strains being developed the way there are for American chestnut or sugar pine? Yes — forest researchers have identified naturally resistant trees and are working on propagation programs aimed at eventually restoring harvestable stands, though as with the other resistance-breeding efforts on this site's species list, commercially available resistant lumber isn't yet a mainstream market reality.
Is Port Orford cedar actually related to true cedar, or is "cedar" just a common name here? Like most North American "cedars," it's botanically a cypress (Chamaecyparis, in the same family as several other trees called cedar), not a true Cedrus — the common name reflects appearance and use rather than close botanical relation.
Does leaving Port Orford cedar bare outdoors risk spreading root disease to other trees the way handling infected material might? No — Phytophthora lateralis spreads through root contact, contaminated soil, and water movement in a living forest, not through a finished, cut board sitting above ground on a structure, so an unfinished outdoor piece poses no disease-transmission risk regardless of the species' own susceptibility as a standing tree.
Port Orford cedar's shrinkage figures come from Table 4-3 of the USDA Forest Products Laboratory's Wood Handbook (FPL-GTR-190, 2010); FPL's own Table 5-3b lists a slightly different 630 lbf Janka figure, while The Wood Database's more commonly cited 590 lbf is used on this page.
Working with Port Orford Cedar
At the bench
Strength-to-weight better than any other North American softwood, which is why it went into aircraft, arrow shafts and Japanese temple joinery as a hinoki substitute. It works cleanly and precisely, holds a knife-cut edge, and smells of ginger. The catch is availability: root rot has closed much of the range to logging.
Glue-up
Bonds well and holds a scarf joint — boatbuilders rely on it.
Finishing
Fine, even texture takes a clear finish beautifully; traditionally left bare in Japanese work.
Durability
Durable, with good resistance to insects.
Commonly used forarrow shafts · boatbuilding · Japanese joinery · musical instrument soundboards · venetian blinds
Health and handling
Recorded as a respiratory irritant and sensitiser.
Conservation status
Phytophthora lateralis root disease has severely reduced the resource and restricted harvest; not CITES-listed.
Where these figures come fromShrinkage figures on this page come from the USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory's Wood Handbook (General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, 2010) - Table 4-3 for North American species and Table 4-4 for imported ones. It is a US federal government publication, it is in the public domain, and it is the reference most other woodworking sites are quietly copying. For the handful of woods those tables do not cover, we use The Wood Database, which reproduces the same FPL figures species by species; every entry says which source its numbers came from. The movement coefficients are not a separate measurement. They are derived from the shrinkage figures the standard way - divide the total green-to-oven-dry shrinkage by 30, the nominal fibre saturation point - so that you can multiply width by the change in moisture content and get an answer in inches. Two honest limits are worth knowing. Shrinkage is not perfectly linear with moisture content, and the fibre saturation point is not exactly 30% for every species; it runs from about 26% to about 34%. And every figure here is a species average drawn from tested samples, while the board on your bench is one tree from one site. Use these numbers to size an expansion gap or choose between two woods, not to predict a specific board to the thousandth.
This species: shrinkage — USDA FPL Wood Handbook (FPL-GTR-190, 2010), Chapter 4, Table 4-3; density — The Wood Database (average dried weight at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook; hardness — USDA FPL Wood Handbook (FPL-GTR-190, 2010), Chapter 5, Table 5-3b. FPL Table 5-3b: specific gravity 0.43 at 12% MC, side hardness 630 lbf; The Wood Database publishes 590 lbf, used here.
CITES appendix and annotation statements on this site were read directly from the CITES Appendices I, II and III valid from 5 March 2026 - the text that entered into force after the 20th Conference of the Parties (CoP20, Samarkand, 24 November to 5 December 2025) - at https://cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php. The appendix number alone does not tell you what is controlled; the annotation does. Annotation #6 covers logs, sawn wood, veneer sheets and plywood. Annotation #17 adds transformed wood, meaning continuously shaped stock such as mouldings and flooring. Annotation #15, used for Dalbergia and the three listed bubingas, regulates all parts and derivatives but exempts finished musical instruments, their parts and accessories, and finished products containing up to 10 kg of the listed wood per shipment. Annotation #2 exempts seeds, pollen and finished products packaged and ready for retail trade. Annotation #4 is broader still and reaches parts and derivatives generally. Listings change at each Conference of the Parties, roughly every three years, and some take effect on a delayed date after that - so check the appendices yourself before you import, and treat this page as a pointer rather than as customs advice.
Prices are 2026 US retail estimates for 4/4 rough stock in hobbyist quantities and vary considerably by region, supplier and grade.