Katalox — Density, Movement, Workability & Cost
Katalox approaches ebony's color and hardness at roughly a quarter of the price, which is why fingerboard makers reach for it as a legitimate substitute.
Swartzia cubensis · also sold as Mexican royal ebony, wamara, palo negro, ironwood
- Density
- 71.6 lb/ft³
- 1147 kg/m³ at 12% MC
- Janka hardness
- 3660 lbf
- 16280 N
- Radial shrinkage
- 3.9%
- coefficient 0.13
- Tangential shrinkage
- 7.6%
- coefficient 0.2533
- T/R ratio
- 1.9
- relatively stable
- Volumetric
- 11.2%
- green to oven-dry
- Typical cost
- $24.00/bf
- premium tier
- Origin
- Imported
- Southern Mexico and Central America
- Type
- Hardwood
A guitar fingerboard needs to be dense, dark, and dimensionally stable, and true ebony delivers all three at a price that puts it out of reach for a lot of builds — katalox (Swartzia cubensis) delivers a genuinely close approximation of the same look and feel at roughly a quarter of gaboon ebony's price, which is exactly why it's become the default budget-ebony substitute in guitar building.
Nearly ebony, at a fraction of the cost
At 71.6 lb/ft³ and 3,660 lbf on the Janka scale, katalox is extremely dense and hard, approaching true ebony's numbers closely enough that most players can't distinguish a katalox fingerboard from a genuine ebony one by feel alone. The heartwood runs from deep purple-brown to near black, though a wide band of pale sapwood typically surrounds it — a buyer pays for the whole log, sapwood included, so asking specifically about heartwood yield matters when ordering.
Movement in small, instrument-scale pieces
Radial shrinkage of 3.9% against a tangential figure of 7.6% gives a 1.9 ratio, just under this site's movement-prone threshold — high enough that a glued-on fingerboard genuinely needs the neck's own seasonal movement considered alongside its own. A 4"-wide blank drying from 9% down to 6% gives up about 0.03" (0.8mm) across the width; the wood movement calculator covers other widths. A 20"-long fingerboard blank at that width, milled 1/2" thick, weighs about 1.7 lb at katalox's very high density — the wood weight calculator covers other blank sizes.
Gluing an oily, dense surface, and a finish that needs little
Some natural oiliness means a degrease before gluing is a sensible precaution, and epoxy is the more reliable structural adhesive over PVA. It cuts cleanly with carbide, turns beautifully, and takes a screw thread — a genuinely metal-like working quality shared with several of the densest species on this site. It burnishes under a scraper to a natural gloss that needs little additional finish.
Durability, cost, and where it competes directly with true ebony
Katalox is very durable, with strong resistance to both termites and marine borers. At roughly $24 per board foot it sits meaningfully below gaboon ebony's roughly $130 and macassar ebony's roughly $110, which is the entire basis of its appeal — a builder who wants ebony's look and feel without ebony's price finds katalox is close enough on both counts to make the substitution genuinely credible rather than a compromise. Guitar fingerboards, turnery, knife scales, inlay, and flooring round out its markets.
The honest comparison, not just the marketing pitch
Katalox doesn't quite match true ebony's absolute density or its uniform jet-black colour — the sapwood band and the somewhat more variable heartwood tone are real, visible differences a careful buyer will notice. What it does deliver is genuinely comparable hardness, comparable stability, and a dramatically lower price, which is exactly the tradeoff that has made it the standard "ebony substitute" rather than a marketing fiction.
What people actually ask about katalox
Do experienced luthiers, as opposed to players, notice a working difference between katalox and true ebony at the bench? Some report katalox as slightly less consistent to fret-slot and radius than dense, uniform gaboon ebony, since the wider sapwood band and more variable heartwood density can behave a touch differently across a single fingerboard blank — a subtlety unlikely to affect a finished instrument's playability but worth knowing before committing to katalox for a highest-tier build.
Why is katalox so much cheaper than gaboon or macassar ebony despite similar density? Broader natural distribution and less demand pressure from the specific luxury and collector markets that drive up true ebony pricing both keep katalox considerably more affordable, even though its raw physical properties are genuinely comparable.
Is the pale sapwood on a katalox board usable for anything? It's usable for non-structural, less demanding applications, but it lacks the heartwood's density, colour, and durability — most buyers specifically request maximum heartwood content for fingerboard or accent work, where the sapwood offers little of the value the species is purchased for.
Katalox is missing from the USDA Forest Products Laboratory's Table 4-4 entirely, so every figure above — density, Janka hardness, shrinkage — comes from The Wood Database's own 12%-moisture-content testing instead.
Working with Katalox
At the bench
Approaching ebony in colour and hardness at a quarter of the price, which is why it turns up as a fingerboard substitute. The heartwood runs from deep purple-brown to near black and there is a wide band of pale sapwood you will be paying for. It cuts cleanly with carbide, turns beautifully and takes a screw thread.
Glue-up
Dense and somewhat oily; degrease and prefer epoxy for structural joints.
Finishing
Burnishes under a scraper to a natural gloss; little more is needed.
Durability
Very durable, with strong resistance to termites and marine borers.
Commonly used forguitar fingerboards · turnery · knife scales · inlay · flooring
Health and handling
Recorded irritant; Swartzia dust causes skin and respiratory irritation.
Where these figures come fromShrinkage figures on this page come from the USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory's Wood Handbook (General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, 2010) - Table 4-3 for North American species and Table 4-4 for imported ones. It is a US federal government publication, it is in the public domain, and it is the reference most other woodworking sites are quietly copying. For the handful of woods those tables do not cover, we use The Wood Database, which reproduces the same FPL figures species by species; every entry says which source its numbers came from. The movement coefficients are not a separate measurement. They are derived from the shrinkage figures the standard way - divide the total green-to-oven-dry shrinkage by 30, the nominal fibre saturation point - so that you can multiply width by the change in moisture content and get an answer in inches. Two honest limits are worth knowing. Shrinkage is not perfectly linear with moisture content, and the fibre saturation point is not exactly 30% for every species; it runs from about 26% to about 34%. And every figure here is a species average drawn from tested samples, while the board on your bench is one tree from one site. Use these numbers to size an expansion gap or choose between two woods, not to predict a specific board to the thousandth.
This species: shrinkage — The Wood Database (shrinkage), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook; density — The Wood Database (average dried weight at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook; hardness — The Wood Database (Janka side hardness at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook. Not in FPL Table 4-4; figures from The Wood Database.
Prices are 2026 US retail estimates for 4/4 rough stock in hobbyist quantities and vary considerably by region, supplier and grade.