KerfMathSupport Us

Catalpa — Density, Movement, Workability & Cost

Only honey mesquite moves less among domestic hardwoods, and catalpa does it at 29 lb/ft3 — a rot-resistant outdoor wood light enough to carry one-handed.

Catalpa speciosa · also sold as cigar tree, catawba, Indian bean tree

Density
29 lb/ft³
465 kg/m³ at 12% MC
Janka hardness
550 lbf
2447 N
Radial shrinkage
2.5%
coefficient 0.0833
Tangential shrinkage
4.9%
coefficient 0.1633
T/R ratio
2.0
moves unevenly
Volumetric
7.3%
green to oven-dry
Typical cost
$7.00/bf
moderate tier
Origin
Domestic
Central United States, widely planted
Type
Hardwood

Catalpa (Catalpa speciosa) has one of the lowest volumetric shrinkage figures of any hardwood the USDA Forest Products Laboratory has tested — lower than every domestic species on this site — and it earned that stability rating while also being soft enough to carve with a dull knife. Those two properties don't usually travel together, which is exactly why nineteenth-century farmers planted entire catalpa groves purely to grow their own fence posts.

Startling stability from an unremarkable-looking tree

At 29 lb/ft³ and 550 lbf on the Janka scale, catalpa is light and soft — it cuts as easily as a coarse ash and holds no particular hardness advantage over any competing softwood. What sets it apart is a volumetric shrinkage of just 7.3%, remarkably low for any hardwood in the FPL's tables, meaning a catalpa post or board holds its shape through humidity swings that would visibly move a denser, seemingly "tougher" species.

The numbers behind why it barely moves at all

Radial shrinkage of 2.5% against a tangential figure of 4.9% gives a 2.0 ratio — technically at this site's movement-prone threshold, but with both raw numbers so low that the practical effect is minimal. A 10"-wide board, seasoned outdoors from a wet 14% down to a drier 8%, loses less than a tenth of an inch, 0.098" (2.5mm), across its width; other widths and swings run through the wood movement calculator. A 1"-thick, 6"-wide, 8-foot fence board weighs about 9.7 lb; other board sizes run through the wood weight calculator.

Easy to cut, easy to glue, hard to find in quantity

Catalpa bonds cleanly under ordinary PVA glue, with nothing about its open pore structure causing any particular difficulty. Indoors, a clear finish preserves its natural greyish-brown tone; left outdoors and unfinished, it weathers to a silver grey the way many stable, moderately durable woods do. The practical limiting factor is supply: catalpa is nearly always an ornamental tree removal rather than a managed timber crop, so boards tend to be short.

Durability, cost, and its historical farm-fence role

Catalpa's heartwood is durable, unusually so for a wood this light — the combination of decay resistance and low movement is exactly what made it worth planting deliberately for fence posts a century ago, when a farmer needed a post that would hold its shape and resist rot without buying imported or treated lumber. At roughly $7 per board foot it's priced in this site's moderate tier despite the modest commercial demand. Fence posts, outdoor furniture, carving, picture frames, and utility poles round out its uses.

An overlooked option worth considering

Against black locust, the other domestic species prized for post-and-fence durability, catalpa gives up real density and hardness but matches it on dimensional stability while being considerably easier to carve or shape by hand — a genuinely useful tradeoff for a project that values ease of working over maximum toughness.

What people actually ask about catalpa

Is catalpa lumber commercially available, or do I need to find my own tree? Commercial supply is limited and regional; most catalpa reaching a woodworker comes from a removed ornamental tree rather than a lumberyard order, so sourcing usually means networking with local tree services or sawyers rather than a standard supplier.

Are catalpa fence-post groves still actively maintained anywhere today, or is that entirely a historical practice? It's almost entirely historical at commercial scale — pressure-treated lumber removed the economic case for dedicated post groves generations ago, though scattered old catalpa plantings from that era still stand on farms across the Midwest, occasionally harvested by a landowner who inherited the trees rather than replanted them on purpose.

Is catalpa strong enough for furniture, given how soft it is? It's adequate for lightly loaded furniture and casework but dents easily under point pressure; its real advantages are stability and workability rather than hardness, so it suits carved or decorative pieces better than anything meant to take heavy daily wear.

Catalpa doesn't appear in the USDA Forest Products Laboratory's main species tables, so density, Janka hardness and shrinkage here are all The Wood Database's figures, which cite that same federal handbook for methodology.

Working with Northern Catalpa

At the bench

Startlingly stable — 7.3% volumetric shrinkage is lower than any domestic hardwood in the FPL table — and light, soft and open-grained like a coarse ash. It cuts easily and holds its shape, which is why fence and gatepost makers valued it out of all proportion to its strength. Boards are usually short and the tree is nearly always an ornamental removal.

Glue-up

Bonds cleanly under PVA; nothing about the open pores causes trouble.

Finishing

Weathers to a silver grey outdoors. Indoors, a clear finish keeps the greyish-brown tone.

Durability

Durable heartwood, unusually so for a wood this light.

Commonly used forfence posts · outdoor furniture · carving · picture frames · utility poles

Where these figures come fromShrinkage figures on this page come from the USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory's Wood Handbook (General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, 2010) - Table 4-3 for North American species and Table 4-4 for imported ones. It is a US federal government publication, it is in the public domain, and it is the reference most other woodworking sites are quietly copying. For the handful of woods those tables do not cover, we use The Wood Database, which reproduces the same FPL figures species by species; every entry says which source its numbers came from. The movement coefficients are not a separate measurement. They are derived from the shrinkage figures the standard way - divide the total green-to-oven-dry shrinkage by 30, the nominal fibre saturation point - so that you can multiply width by the change in moisture content and get an answer in inches. Two honest limits are worth knowing. Shrinkage is not perfectly linear with moisture content, and the fibre saturation point is not exactly 30% for every species; it runs from about 26% to about 34%. And every figure here is a species average drawn from tested samples, while the board on your bench is one tree from one site. Use these numbers to size an expansion gap or choose between two woods, not to predict a specific board to the thousandth.

This species: shrinkage — The Wood Database (shrinkage), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook; density — The Wood Database (average dried weight at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook; hardness — The Wood Database (Janka side hardness at 12% MC), citing USDA FPL Wood Handbook. Absent from FPL Tables 4-3 and 5-3b; all figures from The Wood Database.

Prices are 2026 US retail estimates for 4/4 rough stock in hobbyist quantities and vary considerably by region, supplier and grade.